TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Megaport Survive

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemMegaport Survive  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star Z490-A PRO (MS-7C75)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211020
Uptime36.8 Days
Run DateSep 22 '23 at 16:11
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 892
87% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,304
81% 1,304 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 97.1%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Nvidia(10DE 2487) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 120
Parallax 120
110% 125 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 97.1
Splatting 91.1
87% 108 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 710 1TB
720GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 96 192 186 103 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,787
Write 1,462
Mixed 1,230
SusWrite 156
258% 1,159 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 53.7
184% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 800
580% 749 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 170%
 Great: 305%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
674GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1880 2195 1566 1506 1518 1515 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,302
Write 2,100
Mixed 1,753
SusWrite 1,697
441% 1,963 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 77.1
250% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,281
DQ Write 715
DQ Mixed 976
732% 991 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑
This bench: 318%
 Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 25.5
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 26.6
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 86.9%
 Great: 111%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 20 565 472 100 34.1" 3440 1369 LHC3400 PGM340
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Survive Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

System: Megaport Survive

CPU
Core i7-10700FIntel  $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples9x
Core i7-10700Intel  $233Bench 93%, 71,010 samples2x
Core i7-11700Intel  $226Bench 98%, 20,430 samples1x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples12x
SSD
SNVS1000G 1TBKingstonBench 178%, 18,978 samples3x
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples3x
GM21TB 1TBGigabyteBench 268%, 142 samples3x
RAM
CM4X16GC3200C16K2E 1x16GBCorsairBench 49%, 1,842 samples5x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples2x
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 86%, 13,446 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $446
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback