HP Laptop 14-cf2xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 14-cf2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8658
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220331
Uptime24.8 Days
Run DateSep 22 '23 at 15:54
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 77
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 177
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 251
31% 237 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8658) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 6.1
4% 6.03 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 9
6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,221
Write 1,105
Mixed 1,043
250% 1,123 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 48.2
162% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 226
170% 230 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 300%
SDXC Card 513GB
116GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.2
Write 23.5
Mixed 26.9
33% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.4
164% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C16FG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.6% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 23.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 20.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 14" 1920 1009 AUO213D
Typical Laptop 14-cf2xxx Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-cf2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback