Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '23 at 08:16
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Memory 83.4 1-Core 132 2-Core 256 87% 157 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 824 81% 662 Pts	64-Core 1,021 63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 550.09 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Lighting 186 Reflection 197 Parallax 192 152% 192 fps	MRender 139 Gravity 190 Splatting 130 124% 153 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 133%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 391GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 451 Write 423 Mixed 380 93% 418 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 66.2 4K Mixed 44.3 142% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 351 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55 55,360 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 309GB free Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 964 Write 1,022 Mixed 911 216% 966 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 67.6 4K Mixed 45.2 149% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 434 DQ Mixed 506 355% 443 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 253%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 198 Write 150 Mixed 83.7 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400C14K4 2x8GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.2% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 20.1 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 21.8 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	213	56	30	84.6"	1280 720	SAM71B4 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $191Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,536x
Core i5-8600KIntel $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	840x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	584x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	406x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	353x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	346x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $103Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	148x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $642

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16