Medion MD34824

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemMedion MD34824  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B460H6-EM
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 09:03
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 729
76% 611 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Zotac(19DA 9583) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.8% Good
Lighting 79.5
Reflection 78.2
Parallax 81.2
65% 79.6 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 59.3
53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S41CF256G 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 132 138 140 140 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 385
Write 320
Mixed 296
SusWrite 156
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 23
91% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 33.5
65% 127 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 81%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
148GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 132 131 131 134 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 165
Write 137
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 132
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 23.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 25.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 7.2" 1280 720 SAM025E SAMSUNG
Typical MD34824 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: Medion MD34824

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback