Illegear ONYX V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemIllegear ONYX V  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 08:15
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 286
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 1003
89% 752 Pts
64-Core 1,320
82% 1,320 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Device(1D05 1104) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.8% Average
Lighting 50.4
Reflection 52.8
Parallax 48.4
41% 50.5 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 46.2
Splatting 42.5
40% 50.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,535
Write 2,127
Mixed 1,832
481% 2,165 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 73.2
236% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,081
DQ Write 903
DQ Mixed 970
733% 985 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 316%
Team TM8FPD512G 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: EHFM60.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1927 1923 1925 1169 87 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 878
Write 1,275
Mixed 1,636
SusWrite 1,187
283% 1,244 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 63.5
206% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,103
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 1,000
734% 966 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 214%
Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16G3200CL22 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 23.8" 1280 720 MSI3BB4 MSI G244F
Typical ONYX V Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Illegear ONYX V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback