Positivo VJF155F11X-B3611B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPositivo VJF155F11X-B3611B  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo N250WU-V
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 03:20
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 46.8
1-Core 36.6
2-Core 79.7
33% 54.4 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 193
20% 161 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Clevo(1558 2410) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 8
5% 7.13 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 4.5 12 6.1 119 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 389
Write 292
Mixed 268
SusWrite 59.9
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 11.4
43% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 56
DQ Mixed 40.2
42% 70.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800SO102408-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15DB
Typical VJF155F11X-B3611B Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJF155F11X-B3611B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback