HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8136
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 23:48
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 118
53% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 187
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8136) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 4.8
6% 5.2 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 6.5
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 107 65 63 68 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 437
Write 283
Mixed 325
SusWrite 78
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 32.1
108% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 135
115% 168 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 82%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40
406GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 53 53 53 53 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 103
Write 24.4
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 51.9
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Kingston HP687515-H66-MCN 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 11 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE06A5
Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback