Panasonic CFSZ5-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemPanasonic CFSZ5-2  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFSZ5-2
Memory4.9 GB free of 8.01562 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 21:12
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 127
50% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 159
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4860
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 5.2
4% 5.03 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 5
Splatting 8.6
6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 280 289 285 294 294 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 448
Write 297
Mixed 254
SusWrite 288
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 27
95% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 240
192% 269 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 56GB
1867, 1867, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 18
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 14 85 59 60 12.1" 1280 737 MS_9005 Internal LCD
Typical CFSZ5-2 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CFSZ5-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback