Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X13SAE
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 19:42
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$330
CPU, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 72.1
1-Core 215
2-Core 420
120% 236 Pts
4-Core 745
8-Core 1,192
119% 969 Pts
64-Core 2,311
143% 2,311 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 106%
Great: 131%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7L3240HCHQ-00A07 240GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JXTC104Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 479
Write 272
Mixed 379
83% 377 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 52.3
185% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 281
213% 290 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 115%
Samsung MZ7L31T9HBLT-00A07 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: JXTC304Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 471 464 471 466 464 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 479
Mixed 445
SusWrite 468
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 51.5
177% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 344
259% 346 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 119%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905783-157.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
139% Outstanding
MC Read 55.6
MC Write 55.5
MC Mixed 51.8
155% 54.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 26.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 139%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 210 59 24 0" 1280 720
Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback