Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1MX

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1MX (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20131122
Uptime	16.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '23 at 11:09
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	81%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	45% Average	Memory 72.7 1-Core 45.2 2-Core 76.5 43% 64.8 Pts	4-Core 100 8-Core 120 14% 110 Pts	64-Core 123 8% 123 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.86% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.5 3% 2.6 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 2 Splatting 4.1 3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.86% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3K87RA SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 68 60 39 60 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 381 Write 330 Mixed 153 SusWrite 82.7 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 11.6 63% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 82.2 91% 157 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB 30,873 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.4% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 10.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	61	50	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD7001

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1MX Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1MX

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	4x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	1x
Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	8x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	1x
IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GBLiteonBench 81%, 2,338 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
LX8GDDR3LS1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 49%, 15 samples	2x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	2x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $105

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16