Asus G53SW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus G53SW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G53SW
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '16 at 22:19
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 130
57% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 337
36% 287 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Asus(1043 2047) 1.5GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.26% Terrible
Lighting 9.33
Reflection 11
Parallax 7.66
8% 9.34 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 9.97
Splatting 12.4
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.26%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 509
Write 410
Mixed 420
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 27.2
96% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 98.5
DQ Mixed 15.9
25% 45.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$28
129GB free
Firmware: SD28 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 74.1
Write 77.3
Mixed 77.1
57% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.37
90% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 029E CMSX4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMSX4GX3M1A1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 13.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G53SW Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G53SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $414
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback