Gigabyte H310M A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H310M A
MotherboardGigabyte H310M A  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 02:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
67% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 107
2-Core 92.2
62% 94 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 346
41% 316 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 132
Parallax 156
133% 151 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 131
Splatting 106
114% 145 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 121%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 73 68 99 94 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 139
Write 124
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 85.9
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 20
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 ACR058F Acer KG271
Typical GA-H310M A-CF Builds (Compare 712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte H310M A - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback