bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory78.1GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 78.1GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory74 GB free of 78.125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1131 x 636 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 21:16
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
CPU #000, 16 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 54
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 200
63% 118 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 793
70% 596 Pts
64-Core 1,497
93% 1,497 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 203 225 240 270 254 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Vmware Virtual disk 859GB
408GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 188 190 193 195 188 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 8192, 4096, 2048, 128 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 54.8
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 39.1
123% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 108%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 45 64 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback