MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4(MS-7D91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 371%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 446%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 128%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics302% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive536% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D91
MotherboardMSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4(MS-7D91)  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 01:01
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$277
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
128% Outstanding
Memory 86.1
1-Core 226
2-Core 453
131% 255 Pts
4-Core 908
8-Core 1,721
156% 1,315 Pts
64-Core 3,241
201% 3,241 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 128%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
PNY(196E 13B0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
302% Outstanding
Lighting 456
Reflection 437
Parallax 506
371% 466 fps
MRender 565
Gravity 373
Splatting 270
314% 402 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 302%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1XHE-00AFY0 500GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614900WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2655 3734 4189 2556 954 769 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
536% Outstanding
Read 4,434
Write 4268
Mixed 3,058
SusWrite 2,476
798% 3,559 MB/s
4K Read 83.8
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 97.5
360% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 2393
DQ Write 1981
DQ Mixed 2,136
1,614% 2,170 MB/s
Poor: 216%
This bench: 536%
Great: 516%
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4516 4666 4687 4725 4738 4739 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
571% Outstanding
Read 2,270
Write 3,293
Mixed 2,378
SusWrite 4,678
718% 3,155 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 250
4K Mixed 95.3
330% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 2,092
DQ Write 2,077
DQ Mixed 2,192
1,617% 2,120 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 571%
Great: 614%
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4633 4116 2893 2495 2086 1685 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
432% Outstanding
Read 1,948
Write 2,592
Mixed 1,683
SusWrite 2,985
522% 2,302 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 57.8
263% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 2,153
DQ Write 2,067
DQ Mixed 2,175
1,615% 2,132 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 432%
Great: 614%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMN32GX4M2Z4600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
149% Outstanding
MC Read 61.1
MC Write 57
MC Mixed 53.2
163% 57.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 48.9
SC Mixed 31.9
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 149%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 29.5" 1280 720 AUS3031 XG309CM
Typical MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4(MS-7D91) Builds (Compare 960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 349%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 416%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4(MS-7D91)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback