Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 18 '23 at 16:07
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.9% Poor
Memory 37.8
1-Core 35.2
2-Core 71
29% 48 Pts
4-Core 88.2
8-Core 53
10% 70.6 Pts
64-Core 87.6
5% 87.6 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
XFX(1682 3233) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 22.3
12% 18.1 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 12.3
11% 14.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hdt72251 6DLA380 165GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V43O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 15 25 19 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 50.5
Write 8
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 19
16% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Mixed 0
19% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 0.6
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 19 60 24" 1280 720 ACR0338 B246HL
Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback