Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics65.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 18 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 797
75% 624 Pts
64-Core 1,226
76% 1,226 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.3% Good
Lighting 84.7
Reflection 84.3
Parallax 73.8
69% 80.9 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 70.4
58% 70.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,370
Write 4,388
Mixed 5,606
1,282% 5,788 MB/s
4K Read 375
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 249
1,007% 283 MB/s
DQ Read 1,112
DQ Write 772
DQ Mixed 873
670% 919 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
79GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 460 459 451 460 459 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 460
Mixed 424
SusWrite 458
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 41.8
142% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 294
240% 342 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
822GB free
Firmware: 1201
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 59.8
66% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 74%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 53 53 51 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 98.7
Write 76.2
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 51.6
91% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 27.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 27.3
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 100 34" 1280 720 IVM7628 PL3466WQ
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback