HP 550-102np

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-102np  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B2C
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 18 '23 at 03:46
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 184
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 474
49% 393 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1927 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 41
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 41.2
33% 36.3 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 29.8
24% 29.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 474
Write 319
Mixed 226
75% 340 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 33.6
114% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 246
209% 305 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032V 320GB
20GB free
Firmware: AX0C1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 72 71 72 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 70.2
Write 65.1
Mixed 34
SusWrite 70.7
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 19% 16 165 1 60 21.5" 1920 1080 GSM59A6 22EA53
Typical 550-102np Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP 550-102np

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback