ECS H81H3-M7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS H81H3-M7  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '23 at 22:48
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 79
2-Core 143
59% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 255
33% 248 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E263) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 7.9
5% 8.67 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6.3
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S600 120G 120GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 134 149 95 80 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 471
Write 415
Mixed 399
SusWrite 163
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 24.7
110% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 43.9
92% 182 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 77%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
505GB free
Firmware: 3B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 98 96 95 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 103
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 96.8
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 29 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACI22D1 VK228
Typical H81H3-M7 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-M7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback