Razer Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH580
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '23 at 00:40
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 62.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 207
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 452
49% 389 Pts
64-Core 619
38% 619 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti (Laptop)
Device(1A58 201B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1635 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.9% Below average
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 29
Parallax 69.6
26% 43.6 fps
MRender 33.2
Gravity 53.8
Splatting 64.7
43% 50.6 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 135%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
785GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1744 1692 1571 1622 1553 1619 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 1,684
Write 1,945
Mixed 1,829
SusWrite 1,634
401% 1,773 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 92.9
293% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 735
536% 703 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 290%
Great: 444%
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
504GB free
Firmware: 620311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3048 1692 985 973 1005 1003 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2,101
Write 2,106
Mixed 1,824
SusWrite 1451
421% 1,871 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 77
266% 94.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,041
DQ Write 805
DQ Mixed 969
712% 938 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 296%
Great: 598%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM 4800 C40 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 53.8
MC Mixed 47.4
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 121%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 0P 5R 6G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 36% 33 213 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 TMX1560 TL156VDXP02-0
Typical Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421 Builds (Compare 635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Razer Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback