HP EliteBook 840 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2216
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '23 at 23:18
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 106
47% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 152
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-256G-1006 256GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 238 222 229 249 246 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
66% Good
Read 414
Write 374
Mixed 218
SusWrite 242
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 22.2
78% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 170
145% 214 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66%
Great: 94%
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GB
195GB free
Firmware: AL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 475 311 194 196 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 611
Write 531
Mixed 523
SusWrite 308
111% 493 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 35.9
119% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 402
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 362
269% 358 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.6% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 13.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 0" 1280 720
Typical EliteBook 840 G2 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback