Foxconn H77M/H77M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardFoxconn H77M/H77M-S  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '23 at 22:08
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 178
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 393
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
8.79% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 9.5
8% 11.4 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 10.7
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.79%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1A30Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 287 292 92 31 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 396
Write 274
Mixed 262
SusWrite 164
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 10
86% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 34.6
DQ Write 85.8
DQ Mixed 11.5
23% 44 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 81%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
377GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 129 128 128 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 131
Write 123
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 126
72% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 15 60 18.5" 1366 705 ACR01DE G195HQV
Typical H77M/H77M-S Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H77M/H77M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback