Hyrican PC A320M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemHyrican PC A320M-S2H  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte A320M-S2H-CF
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200831
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 16 '23 at 19:09
Run Duration574 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 52%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 126
2-Core 241
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 722
71% 581 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.4% Good
Lighting 86.3
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 74.5
70% 75.8 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 47.5
59% 75.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UK510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 9 39 145 28 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 400
Write 306
Mixed 208
SusWrite 94.9
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 11.8
46% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 51.3
DQ Mixed 45.4
43% 69.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 59%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
110GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 107 107 110 112 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 113
Write 104
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 110
66% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 107%
USB Flash Memory 2GB
2GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
1% 0.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
1% 0.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
VendorCo ProductCode 268GB
250GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1
Write 0.7
Mixed 1
1% 0.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
12% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.M16FG 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 17.7
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 0P 2R 8G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 21% 86 363 143 100 23.5" 1920 1080 AOC2401 24G1WG4
Typical PC A320M-S2H Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Hyrican PC A320M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback