MSI Z390 PLUS (MS-7C22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 259%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 271%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics307% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C22
MotherboardMSI Z390 PLUS (MS-7C22)  (all builds)
Memory117.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '23 at 03:50
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$272
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 78
1-Core 142
2-Core 280
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 1,025
92% 774 Pts
64-Core 1,453
90% 1,453 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
PNY(196E 13BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Lighting 459
Reflection 450
Parallax 495
374% 468 fps
MRender 584
Gravity 391
Splatting 281
327% 419 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 307%
Great: 305%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 208 215 217 210 217 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 457
Mixed 311
SusWrite 221
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 44.6
155% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 257
213% 307 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GVK 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 28
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 26.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 25.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1920 1009 SAM0D34 C32F391
Typical Z390 PLUS (MS-7C22) Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390 PLUS (MS-7C22)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $673
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback