Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory247.5 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 18:56
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 194
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 730
64% 547 Pts
64-Core 3,202
198% 3,202 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.1% Average
Lighting 53.5
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 50
44% 53.1 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 45.5
42% 52.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.16.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1449 654 670 648 661 666 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,694
Write 1,806
Mixed 1,504
SusWrite 791
326% 1,449 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 49.3
177% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 692
DQ Write 515
DQ Mixed 112
217% 439 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 197%
Great: 313%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
331GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 127 128 130 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 175
Write 127
Mixed 89.6
SusWrite 128
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
883GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 115 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 125
Write 92.6
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 115
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 186 184 185 188 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 128
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 186
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 107 106 105 107 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 139
Write 128
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 105
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 101%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: A3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 123 122 122 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 2.2
Write 125
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 122
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 123 128 126 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 105
Write 123
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 123
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
931GB free
Firmware: 1A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 99 98 100 99 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 92.4
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 95.3
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
488GB free
Firmware: LXM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 149 154 146 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 107
SusWrite 147
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 95%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71
2GB free
Firmware: 0B80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 118
Write 112
Mixed 76.9
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
191% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA8GL7AMR4N-VK 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.8% Very good
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 23.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0D34 C32F391
Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $641
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback