Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 119% UFO	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 110% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200723
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '23 at 15:49
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	MDV-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 120 2-Core 219 77% 138 Pts	4-Core 433 8-Core 708 70% 570 Pts	64-Core 924 57% 924 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479 218,061 User benchmarks, average bench 158% Asus(1043 8813) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	155% Outstanding	Lighting 228 Reflection 210 Parallax 202 186% 213 fps	MRender 240 Gravity 153 Splatting 126 136% 173 fps
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 170%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68 97,624 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 830 382 349 349 295 217 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	194% Outstanding	Read 1,449 Write 1,572 Mixed 1,244 SusWrite 404 262% 1,167 MB/s	4K Read 47.2 4K Write 157 4K Mixed 55.6 226% 86.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,112 DQ Write 843 DQ Mixed 917 702% 957 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 237%
Samsung HD322IJ 320GB 527 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 62GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 96 93 91 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 94.6 Write 102 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 94.2 64% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS6266.C4FE 2x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 15.9 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 15.9 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 89.3 45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	54	22	60	27"	1920 1009	AMT2700 AN-270W03D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	788x
Core i5-10400Intel $124Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	241x
Core i7-10700FIntel $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples	227x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	219x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	211x
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	185x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	116x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	72x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	52x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	127x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	79x
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 83%, 37,374 samples	63x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16