Biostar H310MHP

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar H310MHP (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201127
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '23 at 15:43
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	44%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 83.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 231 81% 144 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 573 65% 509 Pts	64-Core 588 36% 588 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.8% Average	Lighting 54.4 Reflection 54.7 Parallax 47.8 44% 52.3 fps	MRender 41 Gravity 49.9 Splatting 44.1 37% 45 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 240GB 1,111 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 82 24 37 56 55 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.1% Below average	Read 218 Write 102 Mixed 96.7 SusWrite 62.1 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 17.2 60% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 39.2 DQ Write 47.6 DQ Mixed 46.1 34% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 93%
Adata SP600 128GB 8,600 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 31GB free Firmware: 5.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 32 37 41 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D48G8G8H8US9CJRB19 2x8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	65.4% Good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 22.8 72% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 9.6 25% 8.87 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	52	22	240	24.5"	1280 720	KTC3200 UG-32X240

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310MHP Builds (Compare 1,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $130Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	358x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	287x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	134x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	94x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	54x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	66x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	36x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	31x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GBKingstonBench 82%, 4,742 samples	23x
BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 1x8GBUnknownBench 49%, 189 samples	16x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GBUnknownBench 43%, 5,242 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $313

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16