Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512JP
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '23 at 13:29
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 68.7 1-Core 111 2-Core 190 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 481 50% 402 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX330 4,518 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 1B2F) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3179 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 19.4 Reflection 18.4 Parallax 18.5 16% 18.8 fps	MRender 18.8 Gravity 20 Splatting 16.2 15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB 4,206 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 14 14 12 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Read 419 Write 11.4 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 11.5 25% 117 MB/s	4K Read 181 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 3.5 280% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 189%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 560GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 75 91 95 93 79 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 109 Write 91.7 Mixed 70.4 SusWrite 87.9 66% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.7 194% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 23.2 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 22.9 SC Mixed 19.1 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	4	32	16	60	15.5"	1536 864	BOE07F1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	37x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	31x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	28x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	27x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples	13x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	18x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	8x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBNvmeBench 117%, 2,488 samples	6x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 68%, 575 samples	17x
HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 1,684 samples	17x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBMicronBench 69%, 342 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16