Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

12 months ago, 8 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '23 at 11:38
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	BGD-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Memory 86.6 1-Core 123 2-Core 240 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 608 70% 547 Pts	64-Core 655 41% 655 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B A001) ≥ 4GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	6.88% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 12.9 Parallax 14.1 7% 11.8 fps	MRender 7 Gravity 9.4 Splatting 9.3 7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.88% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS120G2G0A-00JH30 120GB 841 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0628A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 73 13 33 69 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 499 Write 437 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 73.8 57% 259 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 1.2 43% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 90 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 0.6 54% 124 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 81%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 750GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 117 117 119 121 119 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 896GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 178 175 183 183 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 183 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 180 101% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
V23D4L84GB1G85282400 2x4GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	69.7% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 19.9 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 20.6 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	18.5"	1280 720	HWP3346 HP V194

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,199x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	694x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	215x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	310x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	210x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	208x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	253x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	153x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	90x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	118x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	56x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16