| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B365M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20200529 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 15 '23 at 07:00 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | SAU-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.2%
Good
|
79% 142 Pts
|
33% 259 Pts
|
21% 336 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 545.37
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
59.7%
Above average
|
64% 76.1 fps
|
52% 64.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Geil R3_240GB 240GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 8.5 45 7.1 18 MB/s
|
30.8%
Below average
|
61% 276 MB/s
|
34% 9.47 MB/s
|
10% 24 MB/s
|
|
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 125 131 127 134 131 MB/s
|
74.3%
Very good
|
87% 119 MB/s
|
181% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown LD4AU008G-H2666G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
71%
Very good
|
73% 25.6 GB/s
|
59% 20.5 GB/s
|
49% 82.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 51 | 18 | 60 | 21.7" | 1280 720 | GSM5B55 LG FULL HD |
Typical B365M-HDV Builds (Compare 2,292 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B365M-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 832x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 267x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 121x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 174x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 162x |
| RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 149x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $280 |