Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 05:25
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 79
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 1,091
98% 825 Pts
64-Core 2,149
133% 2,149 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
XFX(1EAE 7801) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 249
Reflection 248
Parallax 468
203% 322 fps
MRender 326
Gravity 308
Splatting 281
247% 305 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 195%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1980 882 878 843 881 825 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,169
Write 3,679
Mixed 2241
SusWrite 1,048
516% 2,284 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 73
244% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,436
DQ Write 1148
DQ Mixed 1311
976% 1,298 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 284%
Great: 486%
Amd-raid Array 1 718GB
218GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1314 1322 1242 1292 1227 1198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 633
Write 1,360
Mixed 598
SusWrite 1,266
220% 964 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 17.1
81% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 522
DQ Mixed 202
207% 326 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 144%
Great: 160%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 1TB
461GB free
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 335 327 342 340 336 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 416
Write 263
Mixed 364
SusWrite 337
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 27.1
97% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 73.2
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 94.4
82% 117 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73%
Great: 95%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 99 102 103 101 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 99.8
Write 102
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 101
113% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$95
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 31.4
98% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 29.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 VSC8432 VX2778 Series
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,008 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback