Alienware Area-51 R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware Area-51 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0XJKKD
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 00:33
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 166
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 544
54% 441 Pts
64-Core 727
45% 727 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.8% Very good
Lighting 91.8
Reflection 110
Parallax 97.3
75% 99.5 fps
MRender 90.7
Gravity 90.4
Splatting 83.9
72% 88.3 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
612GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1423 1472 1468 1533 1535 1555 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,809
Write 1677
Mixed 1,664
SusWrite 1,498
374% 1,662 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 46.4
149% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 278
205% 272 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 222%
Great: 488%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
414GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 392 394 405 405 408 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 417
Mixed 385
SusWrite 397
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 38.7
126% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 274
206% 276 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 137%
Samsung PM871 2.5 7mm 128GB
102GB free
Firmware: 3D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 146 146 145 147 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 435
Write 151
Mixed 187
SusWrite 147
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 27.3
101% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 184
148% 213 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 87%
Crucial MX500 4TB-$299
460GB free
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 403 409 412 395 409 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 334
Write 389
Mixed 335
SusWrite 405
83% 366 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 33.9
88% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 141
136% 217 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 119%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
4.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 224 229 224 230 228 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 241
Write 215
Mixed 104
SusWrite 226
143% 196 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.1
255% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 134%
Great: 88%
DAS TerraMaster 3TB
861GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 102
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 38.7
114% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 21.4
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 100 34.1" 1280 720 ACR0450 Acer X34
Typical Area-51 R2 Builds (Compare 1,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Alienware Area-51 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback