Ciara H110MAD-XA

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	Ciara H110MAD-XA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK H110M-A/DP
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170106
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '23 at 14:17
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$68 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 187 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 322 41% 311 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 26.20.100.7263 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	4.96% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 6.1 Parallax 5.9 4% 5.8 fps	MRender 7.3 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 8.9 6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.96% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ PETROL 256GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 219 219 220 220 219 MB/s Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.6% Average	Read 278 Write 232 Mixed 165 SusWrite 220 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 18.2 69% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 60.6 DQ Mixed 62.9 53% 79.1 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-4 2x4GB 235 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.3% Good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 19.9 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 17.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	23.8"	1280 720	HPN3661 HP P24h G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110MAD-XA Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Ciara H110MAD-XA

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $68Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	9x
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	2x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	1x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	11x
HD 5870AMDBench 19%, 10,176 samples	1x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x

SSD
PETROL 256GBOCZBench 49%, 56 samples	7x
Blue 500GBWD $93Bench 86%, 19,345 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
HP24D4U7S8MBP-4 2x4GBKingstonBench 74%, 235 samples	4x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G3E1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 1,083 samples	2x
HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 66%, 5,828 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $68

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16