Ciara H110MAD-XA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCiara H110MAD-XA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H110M-A/DP
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 14 '23 at 14:14
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$67
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 350
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 5.2
4% 5.07 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 7.6
5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ PETROL 256GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 205 218 219 221 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 267
Write 235
Mixed 142
SusWrite 214
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 15.6
64% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 62.2
55% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 55%
OCZ PETROL 256GB
228GB free
Firmware: 3.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 209 220 219 218 218 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 292
Write 231
Mixed 173
SusWrite 217
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 17
66% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 72.2
DQ Mixed 59
53% 81.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-4 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.8% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 19.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELA113 DELL P2219H
Typical H110MAD-XA Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Ciara H110MAD-XA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback