CDM Q87I-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemCDM Q87I-PLUS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87I-PLUS
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '23 at 11:10
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 510
55% 437 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Lighting 74.6
Reflection 77.2
Parallax 69.7
61% 73.8 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 69.5
57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.1.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 385 405 399 402 395 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 380
Write 473
Mixed 428
SusWrite 381
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 34
119% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 286
211% 277 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 313%
Seagate ST31000340NS 1TB-$95
931GB free
Firmware: SN06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 103 103 105 102 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 102
67% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 70.7
56% 70.7 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 120 27" 1920 1017 MSI3CA9 MSI G27C4
Typical Q87I-PLUS Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: CDM Q87I-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback