Casper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER LGAB 001
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '23 at 11:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 189
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 382
43% 336 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Quanta(152D 1241) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 7.9
5% 9.73 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 77 76 77 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55% Above average
Read 122
Write 229
Mixed 96.1
SusWrite 75.4
30% 131 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 37.7
132% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 65.6
DQ Mixed 41.8
48% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 23.1
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 22.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO80EC
Typical NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback