Acer Aspire A315-41G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-41G  (all builds)
MotherboardRR Metapod_RR
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '23 at 08:31
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 41.2
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 118
44% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 149
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Acer(1025 1259) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 11
Parallax 5.2
4% 7.23 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hkvsn HS-SSD-E100NI/128G 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1204B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 166 29 214 31 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 422
Write 351
Mixed 327
SusWrite 84.9
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 12.8
70% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 70.9
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 0.9
38% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 82%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 100 114 101 98 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4R8GS24A8R 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
62.4% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 20
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 9 60 15.5" 1366 768 BOE0675
Typical Aspire A315-41G Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-41G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback