MSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B22
MotherboardMSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22)  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '23 at 02:46
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 137
53% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 384
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 115
Parallax 119
103% 120 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 104
Splatting 90.1
87% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 672 419 322 271 226 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,478
Write 1496
Mixed 1,183
SusWrite 348
252% 1,126 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 49.3
190% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,212
DQ Write 954
DQ Mixed 954
749% 1,040 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 186%
Great: 237%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
809GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 411 429 442 459 451 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 371
Write 318
Mixed 336
SusWrite 424
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 35.4
123% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 350
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 137%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
369GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 101 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 80.2
Write 88.2
Mixed 66
SusWrite 102
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.4
162% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 029E CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 029E CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.4% Good
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 24.4
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 14.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 29 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM775C LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22) Builds (Compare 4,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22) - $108

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback