Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '23 at 17:51
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 19.4
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 129
36% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 355
33% 276 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 83 72 67 76 69 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.8% Below average
Read 187
Write 132
Mixed 133
SusWrite 82.9
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 12.6
46% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 139
104% 138 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
459GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 82 85 91 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 108
Write 119
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 84.3
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CML8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 13.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 325
12% 325 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 17 64 0" 1296 768
Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback