Gigabyte GA-Z790M AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 468%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 548%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 125%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics394% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive643% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z790M AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230724
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '23 at 08:19
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$292
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 221
2-Core 442
129% 250 Pts
4-Core 870
8-Core 1,575
147% 1,222 Pts
64-Core 3006
186% 3006 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 125%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
Gigabyte(1458 40E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
394% Outstanding
Lighting 631
Reflection 592
Parallax 729
514% 651 fps
MRender 541
Gravity 579
Splatting 312
374% 477 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 394%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM790 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12237
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4293 4286 4376 4432 4427 4433 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
643% Outstanding
Read 3,523
Write 4,886
Mixed 3199
SusWrite 4,375
905% 3,996 MB/s
4K Read 83.3
4K Write 309
4K Mixed 125
450% 172 MB/s
DQ Read 2,426
DQ Write 1,925
DQ Mixed 1,843
1,470% 2,065 MB/s
Poor: 294%
This bench: 643%
Great: 648%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
188% Outstanding
MC Read 77.9
MC Write 75.5
MC Mixed 69.7
212% 74.4 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 52.6
SC Mixed 31.2
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 188%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 0P 3R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 6% 136 510 367 120 72.3" 1280 720 GSM81CD LG TV SSCR2
Typical GA-Z790M AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z790M AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback