Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST E5-MR9A PRO
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221024
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateSep 13 '23 at 00:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 176
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 711
63% 535 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.1% Above average
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 75.6
Parallax 68.1
55% 70.3 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 70
Splatting 67.6
56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microfrom 512GB M.2 NVMe SSD 512GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0926A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 704 137 21 649 21 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,442
Write 1,002
Mixed 897
SusWrite 259
200% 900 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 21.6
122% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 477
DQ Mixed 292
246% 350 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 126%
Great: 287%
SSD 480GB 480GB
75GB free
Firmware: FW201219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 12 57 11 60 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.7% Average
Read 251
Write 224
Mixed 221
SusWrite 31
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 13.7
99% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 19.6
49% 105 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 32GB
2133, 3200, 3200, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 34.4
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 28.9" 1280 720 AOC0000 AOC FTV
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback