Asus PRIME Q270M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Q270M-C  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191021
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '23 at 00:32
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 254
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 650
67% 542 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.8% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 59.8
49% 59.8 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 59.8
49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SV9SAT6B480GLM21DR 480GB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1176.1.A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 455 474 473 479 479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 475
Mixed 347
SusWrite 468
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 38.4
136% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 194
184% 287 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
607GB free
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1401 573 570 573 563 571 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,067
Write 2,281
Mixed 1,842
SusWrite 709
387% 1,725 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 67.5
229% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,115
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 1,030
774% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 243%
Great: 300%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
823GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 163 162 163 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 168
Mixed 110
SusWrite 162
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
653GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 168 169 167 169 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 174
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 168
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 26
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 27
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 0R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 8% 49 565 471 60 27.7" 1280 720 ACR0585 Acer XB272
History: Score 26: 0P 3R 3G 2B | Score 8: 0P 0R 2G 2B
Typical PRIME Q270M-C Builds (Compare 231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Q270M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback