Asus N82JQ

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	Asus N82JQ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N82JQ
Memory	2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110126
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '23 at 00:07
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Memory 92 1-Core 47.5 2-Core 77.1 50% 72.2 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 164 19% 149 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 335M 977 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1342) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	2.67% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.6 3% 2.43 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 2.1 2% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.67% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 42 41 41 42 40 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.9% Poor	Read 197 Write 49.1 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 42.1 18% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 26.5 4K Mixed 10.1 55% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 18.3 DQ Write 40 DQ Mixed 13.8 15% 24 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$28 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 189GB free Firmware: 0003SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 66 67 68 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 60.4 Write 62.4 Mixed 37 SusWrite 66.7 42% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 06C1 SSZ3128M8-EDJED 6GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.3% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 10.3 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 9.1 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	44	10	60	13.9"	1280 720	AUO183C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N82JQ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N82JQ

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	19x
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 335MNvidiaBench 3%, 977 samples	20x

SSD
AS350 256GBApacerBench 70%, 5,875 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 06C1 SSZ3128M8-EDJED 6GBUnknownBench 35%, 3 samples	2x
99U5469-035.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 40%, 81 samples	2x
HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 29%, 1,376 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16