Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130417
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '23 at 21:43
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$147 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2120 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 89 1-Core 72.8 2-Core 132 61% 97.8 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 181 23% 176 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85C1) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.8% Poor	Lighting 36.3 Reflection 40.1 Parallax 37.5 30% 38 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 27 27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,465 Write 1,597 Mixed 1,500 410% 1,854 MB/s	4K Read 97.4 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 47.7 236% 65.3 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 242 159% 187 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 90GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 138 132 127 132 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.1% Average	Read 187 Write 149 Mixed 118 SusWrite 132 33% 146 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 18 74% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 27.7 DQ Write 71.1 DQ Mixed 23.2 25% 40.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-001.A00LF 2x4GB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.2% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 13.7 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	31.5"	1280 720	GSM76F5 32inch LG FHD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $72

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	873x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	597x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	356x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	375x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	255x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	182x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	172x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	99x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	87x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	52x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	45x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16