Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory50.3 GB free of 56 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 21:20
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 156
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 603
58% 476 Pts
64-Core 1,660
103% 1,660 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 184
Parallax 174
136% 175 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 175
Splatting 120
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 381 373 377 354 357 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 447
Mixed 422
SusWrite 370
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 43.4
140% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 326
250% 340 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 129%
HP 365GB MLC PCIe ioDrive2 for ProLiant Servers 365GB
233GB free
Firmware: 7.1.15 rev 110356 Public Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 500 505 501 500 499 500 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 740
Write 516
Mixed 506
SusWrite 501
127% 566 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 44.5
155% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 528
DQ Mixed 142
195% 351 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 128%
Great: 151%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 97 106 98 109 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 111
Write 91
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 99.8
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 109 109 110 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 94.4
Write 62.1
Mixed 94.1
SusWrite 108
67% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
110% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 67%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
3TB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 135 134 138 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 102
SusWrite 135
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 99%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
3TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 117 115 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 130
Write 111
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 116
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 83%
WD Re 2TB-$35
2TB free
Firmware: 1D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 135 137 138 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 136
Write 130
Mixed 113
SusWrite 136
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 78%
Great: 83%
WD Re 2TB-$35
2TB free
Firmware: 1D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 135 136 138 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 139
Write 137
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 136
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
234% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GB
7 of 8 slots used
56GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 35.2
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23" 1280 720 SAM041F SyncMaster
Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback