Acer Aspire A315-55G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-55G  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Happy_WC
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200703
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 15:40
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 149
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 178
20% 157 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1345) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 4.8
4% 8 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.5
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KIOXIA-EXCERIA S 250GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA12.9 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 254 244 250 201 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 389
Write 682
Mixed 480
SusWrite 252
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 24.4
83% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 235
185% 257 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 191%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
132GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 105 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69% Good
Read 126
Write 105
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 113
71% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
213% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.6
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.2
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1366 768 BOE07CE
Typical Aspire A315-55G Builds (Compare 1,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-55G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback