HP Elite Mini 600 G9 Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Elite Mini 600 G9 Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 894F
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 07:39
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 175
2-Core 304
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 735
78% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,008
62% 1,008 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
HP(103C 894F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4274
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
8.69% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 81.4
Parallax 11.3
8% 34.2 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.69%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
909GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2236 2371 762 768 767 745 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,293
Write 2,362
Mixed 1,756
SusWrite 1,275
432% 1,922 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 99.3
318% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,846
DQ Write 1,254
DQ Mixed 1,259
1,018% 1,453 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 338%
Great: 336%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 59.3
MC Write 55.6
MC Mixed 53.7
161% 56.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 27.2
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 144%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 DELA122 DELL U3219Q
Typical Elite Mini 600 G9 Desktop PC Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite Mini 600 G9 Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback