Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 07:28
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 73.4
1-Core 137
2-Core 271
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 801
79% 648 Pts
64-Core 1,053
65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 05BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.1% Average
Lighting 61.3
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 82
50% 67.6 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 44.6
44% 55.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-PX500-512-80 512GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,912
Write 1,388
Mixed 935
312% 1,412 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 38.7
224% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 545
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 61.8
219% 472 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 256%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
569GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 131 151 155 157 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 146
Write 169
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 148
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/4GX KHX3200C16D4/4GX 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.9% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 24.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 25
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5AB7 LG IPS FULLHD
Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback