Lenovo 20CLCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20CLCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20CLCTO1WW
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 03:49
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 43.1
1-Core 73.7
2-Core 129
46% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 184
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2226) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 6
4% 3.97 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 3.9
3% 4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 128GB 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0909A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 41 53 47 32 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 294
Write 314
Mixed 212
SusWrite 48.2
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 14.3
49% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 39.2
57% 107 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 155%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
145GB free
Firmware: SBFMT1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 181 258 304 226 242 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 302
Write 136
Mixed 256
SusWrite 248
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 19.8
68% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 160
121% 160 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 40 60 12.5" 1280 720 LEN40E0
Typical 20CLCTO1WW Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20CLCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback