Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 21:59
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8259U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 166
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 306
35% 275 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 5.3
4% 4.73 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 5
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teclast BD256GB SLCB-2280 256GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN06201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 172 176 175 91 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 338
Write 146
Mixed 195
SusWrite 146
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 18.2
81% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 114
106% 163 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 55%
Great: 93%
Intenso Sata III 256GB
187GB free
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 363 369 406 411 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 448
Write 374
Mixed 366
SusWrite 387
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 19.2
79% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 38.3
88% 177 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4A8G165WB-BCRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 18.8
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0747
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback