Intel NUC8v5PNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel(R) NUC8v5PNH
MotherboardIntel NUC8v5PNB  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 17:19
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8365U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 230
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 475
53% 416 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel(8086 2096) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.12% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7
Parallax 7.4
5% 6.9 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 12.3
8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.12%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1348 386 392 391 395 394 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,356
Write 2,073
Mixed 1,408
SusWrite 551
356% 1,597 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 78.5
261% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 935
DQ Write 648
DQ Mixed 828
609% 804 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 244%
Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
238GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 423 443 444 446 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 467
Mixed 418
SusWrite 441
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 53.5
182% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 348
263% 354 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 119%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AQD-SD4U8GN24-SE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 30 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F33 U32J59x
Typical NUC8v5PNB Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC8v5PNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback